Kairos in Rhetoric
From DigitalRhetoricCollaborative
(Created page and added sections) |
m (references) |
||
| (17 intermediate revisions not shown.) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | Kairos (Greek: καιρός - usually translated as “the opportune or appropriate time”) is a moment when conditions are fit for the accomplishment of a crucial action. Rhetorically speaking, it is a particularly opportune window for a rhetor to introduce a point. From a speaker’s standpoint, strategically timing the implementation of an idea in a rhetorical context demonstrates kairos. | + | Kairos (Greek: '''καιρός''' - usually translated as “the opportune or appropriate time”) is a moment when conditions are fit for the accomplishment of a crucial action.<ref>"Kairos." ''Merriam-Webster.'' Web. [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/kairos]</ref> The origin of the word, though non-rhetorical, illustrates its modern use well. Its first meaning referred to “a narrow slit in a wall through which a soldier would shoot an arrow. If the target was moving, and the soldier only had a very narrow gap, the timing of the shot was crucial.”<ref>Keith, William M., and Christian O. Lundberg. ''The Essential Guide to Rhetoric.'' Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2008. Print.</ref> Kairos is often contrasted with the Greek Chronos. Both translate to "time", but the former refers to a single moment without a specified length, and the latter refers to a specified length of time. Kairos is qualitative and Chronos is quantitative.<ref>Kinneavy, James L. and Catherine R. Eskin. "Kairos in Aristotle's Rhetoric." ''Written Communication.'' 11.1 (1994): 131-142. ''JSTOR.'' Web.</ref> Rhetorically speaking, it is a particularly opportune window for a rhetor to introduce a point. From a speaker’s standpoint, strategically timing the implementation of an idea in a rhetorical context demonstrates kairos. In rhetorical discourse, it is closely related to the concept of rhetorical situation, and can be further defined as a moment in which the rhetorical situation is exceptionally favorable towards the speaker. |
| - | + | ==Artifact Analysis== | |
| - | + | The analyzed artifact is a [http://www.drugpolicy.org/docUploads/RockefellerLetter1937.pdf letter] from John D. Rockefeller, Jr. to Nicholas Murray Butler, a former president of Columbia University. The letter was published in The New York Times on June 6th, 1932. In the letter, Rockefeller publicly announced his support for the repeal of alcohol prohibition and the 21st Amendment. This sent shockwaves through the American public, because he had previously been a staunch supporter of prohibition--a lifelong teetotaler. | |
| - | + | Amending the US Constitution is incredibly difficult. The writers made sure that the document could only be changed with great and widespread consensus: it must pass both the House and the Senate by a two-thirds vote and then be ratified by three-fourths of the States. For this to happen, public opinion must be strong and widespread enough to warrant it, and that can only happen with the perfect confluence of circumstances. Prohibition passed because of the confluence of women’s suffrage, WWI, and powerful interest group activity. Repeal was only made possible a few years later because of a drastic shift in public opinion, and one of the biggest pulls came from a shocking letter from J. D. Rockefeller in 1932, in which he publicly declared in The New York Times that he had changed his mind and no longer supported Prohibition, and now supported Repeal. This rocked American conservatives to their core. | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | Prohibition originally passed with the help of propaganda from the Anti-Saloon League, promising that Prohibition would cure society of all its ills: laziness, inefficiency, violence, poverty, and liver disease would be a thing of the past. When this failed to happen, and organized crime increased and became mythologized, and drinking in speakeasies became glamorized, public opinion started to waver. Then, the stock market crash of 1929 and the Great Depression happened, and support for prohibition withered drastically as other powerful interest groups began releasing propaganda that promised Repeal would fix all of their problems. Just as Prohibition was presented as a societal panacea, Repeal was presented likewise. Skip ahead to 1932. It is in the darkest pits of the Depression, and many people are using Prohibition as a scapegoat. The Repeal advocates are gaining ground, and people could honestly just use a distraction from their woes. The conservative base of America was still hesitant to mobilize, however, until they received a bombshell from one the most powerful and respected men in America. When Rockefeller changed his mind and made it public in The New York Times, it was at the perfect time - a crucial moment in American History when reform was in the air, and laws that never would have passed otherwise flew through Congress. One of these was Repeal. Rockefeller’s ethos was such that his opinion held great sway with the average citizen. Prohibition scholars regard this as the nail in the coffin of Prohibition. 1932 is a Kairotic moment for Repeal-supporters, and it was the combination of public desperation for change, drastic changes in public opinion and Rockefeller's ethos that granted the rhetorical situation Kairos. | |
==Additional Resources== | ==Additional Resources== | ||
| + | |||
| + | [http://wcx.sagepub.com/content/11/1/131.full.pdf Kairos in Aristotle's Rhetoric] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [http://www.jstor.org/stable/378742?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=kairos&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicResults%3FQuery%3Dkairos%26amp%3Bacc%3Don%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3Bgroup%3Dnone%26amp%3Bsi%3D26&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents Kairos and Kenneth Burke's Psychology of Political and Social Communication] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [http://www.jstor.org/stable/27902109?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=(kairos)&searchText=AND&searchText=la:(eng&searchText=OR&searchText=en)&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3D%2528kairos%2529%2BAND%2Bla%253A%2528eng%2BOR%2Ben%2529%26amp%3Bprq%3D%2528rhetoric%2529%2BAND%2Bla%253A%2528eng%2BOR%2Ben%2529%26amp%3Bgroup%3Dnone%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bso%3Drel%26amp%3Bhp%3D25%26amp%3Bla%3Deng%2BOR%2Ben%26amp%3Bacc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents. Time, Times, and the 'Right Time'; "Chronos" and "Kairos"] | ||
| + | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| - | < | + | <references/> |
Current revision
Kairos (Greek: καιρός - usually translated as “the opportune or appropriate time”) is a moment when conditions are fit for the accomplishment of a crucial action.[1] The origin of the word, though non-rhetorical, illustrates its modern use well. Its first meaning referred to “a narrow slit in a wall through which a soldier would shoot an arrow. If the target was moving, and the soldier only had a very narrow gap, the timing of the shot was crucial.”[2] Kairos is often contrasted with the Greek Chronos. Both translate to "time", but the former refers to a single moment without a specified length, and the latter refers to a specified length of time. Kairos is qualitative and Chronos is quantitative.[3] Rhetorically speaking, it is a particularly opportune window for a rhetor to introduce a point. From a speaker’s standpoint, strategically timing the implementation of an idea in a rhetorical context demonstrates kairos. In rhetorical discourse, it is closely related to the concept of rhetorical situation, and can be further defined as a moment in which the rhetorical situation is exceptionally favorable towards the speaker.
[edit] Artifact Analysis
The analyzed artifact is a letter from John D. Rockefeller, Jr. to Nicholas Murray Butler, a former president of Columbia University. The letter was published in The New York Times on June 6th, 1932. In the letter, Rockefeller publicly announced his support for the repeal of alcohol prohibition and the 21st Amendment. This sent shockwaves through the American public, because he had previously been a staunch supporter of prohibition--a lifelong teetotaler.
Amending the US Constitution is incredibly difficult. The writers made sure that the document could only be changed with great and widespread consensus: it must pass both the House and the Senate by a two-thirds vote and then be ratified by three-fourths of the States. For this to happen, public opinion must be strong and widespread enough to warrant it, and that can only happen with the perfect confluence of circumstances. Prohibition passed because of the confluence of women’s suffrage, WWI, and powerful interest group activity. Repeal was only made possible a few years later because of a drastic shift in public opinion, and one of the biggest pulls came from a shocking letter from J. D. Rockefeller in 1932, in which he publicly declared in The New York Times that he had changed his mind and no longer supported Prohibition, and now supported Repeal. This rocked American conservatives to their core.
Prohibition originally passed with the help of propaganda from the Anti-Saloon League, promising that Prohibition would cure society of all its ills: laziness, inefficiency, violence, poverty, and liver disease would be a thing of the past. When this failed to happen, and organized crime increased and became mythologized, and drinking in speakeasies became glamorized, public opinion started to waver. Then, the stock market crash of 1929 and the Great Depression happened, and support for prohibition withered drastically as other powerful interest groups began releasing propaganda that promised Repeal would fix all of their problems. Just as Prohibition was presented as a societal panacea, Repeal was presented likewise. Skip ahead to 1932. It is in the darkest pits of the Depression, and many people are using Prohibition as a scapegoat. The Repeal advocates are gaining ground, and people could honestly just use a distraction from their woes. The conservative base of America was still hesitant to mobilize, however, until they received a bombshell from one the most powerful and respected men in America. When Rockefeller changed his mind and made it public in The New York Times, it was at the perfect time - a crucial moment in American History when reform was in the air, and laws that never would have passed otherwise flew through Congress. One of these was Repeal. Rockefeller’s ethos was such that his opinion held great sway with the average citizen. Prohibition scholars regard this as the nail in the coffin of Prohibition. 1932 is a Kairotic moment for Repeal-supporters, and it was the combination of public desperation for change, drastic changes in public opinion and Rockefeller's ethos that granted the rhetorical situation Kairos.
[edit] Additional Resources
Kairos in Aristotle's Rhetoric
Kairos and Kenneth Burke's Psychology of Political and Social Communication
Time, Times, and the 'Right Time'; "Chronos" and "Kairos"
