OCW audit A

From openmichigan

Revision as of 14:18, 22 July 2015 by Bdr (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


OCW Audit A (BG)


Contents

[edit] Course Content

  • Web pages, PDF, Small Handouts and Books
  • Extensive use of recorded materials available for download

[edit] Copyright Concerns

  • Minor
  • Some of the images contained in the course packs will be problematic, but they are almost certainly replaceable.

[edit] Privacy Concerns

  • Possibly Major.
  • Many of the course material are real, identifiable people telling their stories.

[edit] Level of Editing Needed

  • Moderate
  • Privacy concerns will need to be actively addressed.
  • Some images will need to be replaced.
  • Inserting license/disclaimer page in the documents and checking the citation/reading list for valid URLs and/or URLs to infringing content, not much.

[edit] Level of Publishing Needed

  • Moderate
  • The Professors have a very sophisticated teaching method, containing a lot of media. They want to ensure that they produce a high quality material that will possess a good deal of educational credibility.
  • There is another year of class materials that will need to be prepared as well.

[edit] dScribe Method Recommendation

  • dScribes should not be used. Staff should work with the Professors and the Scholarly Publishing Office.

[edit] Training Requirements

  • N/A

[edit] Next Steps / Notes

  • Bobby and Piet will meet and discuss a concrete slate of options to offer the professors.
  • Bobby will be in contact with Maria Bonn to gain information about the publishing possibilities.
  • An assistant on the program contacted Piet about getting video content onto U-M's YouTube channel. Piet contacted Brett Ashley and John Pariseau to figure out who is in charge of that channel now.
  • Long term issues regarding acceptance of open materials by tenure committees keep coming up.
Personal tools