Course audit-HMP-657

From openmichigan

Revision as of 14:18, 22 July 2015 by Bdr (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Audit for openness of course or resource: HMP-657

Contents

[edit] Course Content

  • Primarily MS Word doc handouts, teaching notes, and articles.
  • Notably, there are no lecture slides (see Next Steps).

[edit] Copyright Concerns

  • Very little.
  • Just don't publish the articles that were made available in CTools.

[edit] Privacy Concerns

  • Very little.
  • The cases appear to be fabricated/anonymized.

[edit] Level of Editing Needed

  • Relatively Little.
  • Aside from inserting license/disclaimer page in the documents and checking the citation/reading list for valid URLs and/or URLs to infringing content, not much.

[edit] Level of Publishing Needed

  • Normal to Little.
  • For each week there will simply be a handout or two, and teaching notes.

[edit] dScribe Method Recommendation

  • DIY and/or Faculty-GSI with Open.Michigan final review/stamp of approval

[edit] Training Requirements

  • Copyright: very very little as all that really needs to happen is not publishing the articles.
  • Need to train how to edit/license the material to our standards.

[edit] Next Steps

  • Greg will email the professor to confirm that he either does not have lecture slides or does not want to share them publicly. The "Teaching Notes" are practically a stand in.
  • If there are no lecture slides, then Greg will email the prof with the team's recommendation for dScribe method.
  • Depending on method, Greg will set up a training session time/location.
Personal tools