Platform Comparison Table

From openmichigan

Revision as of 12:05, 20 October 2011 by Pieter (Talk)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Platform Comparison Table


eduCommons Connexions Drupal Moodle BlueStream

Infrastructure Features

first generation

Reasonable price open source open source open source open source $ + many 0's
Sysadmin maintenance minimal, enPraxis CNX hosts yes, extensive yes? minimal
Support community small, enPraxis author support through email and phone large growing  ?, U-M group
Usable system interface fair good fair  ? poor
Access management roles for publishing public vs. private user-defined roles  ? asset-level access, roles
Batch upload zip file w/few fields  ?, need to play  ?  ? yes - ?
Media neutrality yes, restrictions?  ?: XML presentation, supports other media but we need to play  ?  ? yes (limited)
Extensive and customizable metadata good maybe?  ?  ? good
Machine readable metadata no?  ?  ?  ?  ?
Hierarchies of content yes, course-based learning modules, not granular  ?  ? yes, parent-child
Indexing and search  ? search by a few metadata fields only  ?  ? extensive (depending on media type)
Push content out  ? other sites can pull out content (URLs)  ?  ?  ?
Web services API no similar service, but not yet (other sites can pull out content (URLs))  ?  ? yes (several, since bluestream is a mix of components)

future generations

OCR text in video no no no no  ?
Audio to text no no no no yes (limited)
dScribe & OERca integration IMS content package export/import from OERca unsure  ?  ? Web Services?
Embedded image extraction no no no no no
File type conversion no no no no  ?
Export pages as images no no no no  ?
Language translation no unsure no no  ?

Interface Features

first generation

eduCommons Connexions Drupal Moodle BlueStream
Basic and advanced search yes, but not by content type yes, but not by content type  ?  ? yes
Dynamic and flexible search result filtering and sorting no yes  ?  ? no
Basic browsing yes yes yes yes yes, but needs better interface
Display of related content no yes, limited  ?  ?  ?
RSS feeds yes yes, hidden yes yes  ?

future generations

User-defined tagging no yes yes yes? yes?
User favorites/portfolio no yes, favorites and lenses  ?  ? no
User-ratings no not quite - does have endorsements and peer-review (to a degree) yes? yes? no
Social network integration no no yes? yes? no
Passive and active collaborative filtering no no yes  ? no
Dynamic and flexible browse filtering and sorting no no no no no
Personal tools