From DigitalRhetoricCollaborative

The database is currently locked to new entries and other modifications, probably for routine database maintenance, after which it will be back to normal.

The administrator who locked it offered this explanation:

You must login before you can edit.

You can view and copy the source of this page:

==Introduction== Background Information The ad https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nj70XqOxptU that is analyzed through the lens of rhetorical appeals is “understand” by Priorities USA action. Priorities USA action is an independent expenditure, essentially means it is a “political campaign communication” system that explicitly looks to support or derail a candidate by means of advocacy or attack ads. This campaign communication is prohibited to have any contact with the candidate, or the candidates committee. It also happens to be a PAC, political action committee, which funds a campaign by donating funds allocated from members and other contributors. The ad in support of presidential candidate Barrack Obama attacks Mitt Romney, his political opponent running for the presidency, on the belief that because of his closing of a steel plant, Joe lost his job and was unable to pay insurance for his sickly wife in the ensuing days died. Rhetorical appeals are used to help achieve a desired effect on an audience. The three appeals are ethos, pathos, and logos. Ethos is an appeal to credibility. The rhetor uses ethos to show the audience that he knows what he’s talking about. Pathos is an appeal to emotions. This can mean anything from making the audience laugh to making them cry. By appealing to the audience’s emotions, the rhetor forces his message to have a stronger impact on the audience. Logos is an appeal to logic. In using logos, the rhetor communicates his message using simple reasoning. He/She is trying to make his/her message as logical as possible so that a reasonable audience will feel the same way. ==Ethos== Ethos is in collaboration with and an adherence to credibility and validity. With ethos the reader, respondent, or audience must be assured of the certainty of character wherein the speaker or rhetor is concerned. Ethos looks to establish a sense of respect and acknowledgement that, “the speaker knows what he/she is talking about”. Ethos should alleviate any questions of why should I believe you, i.e ethos is the unspoken credentials. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nj70XqOxptU So why do we believe this Joe? Why should I humor what he says as truth? The ethos in this particular video comes from the “personable” nature of the speaker. As we watch the video we are assured that anyone can be this man, though we do not know him we understand his plight as a common man. Joe is able to assure the audience of his honesty because the audience acknowledges his beliefs and his standard of values that being family and his concern for job security. His ethos ultimately is intertwined and heavily contingent upon his pathos. ==Pathos== In progress ==Logos== Priorities USA Action’s overall intention with the commercial is to provide more evidence to support their claim that “If Mitt Romney wins, the middle class loses.” This specific commercial is meant to portray Romney as someone who is out of touch with the middle class. Their argument develops as follows: - The reference to Romney making “millions” before closing the plant depicts him as someone of considerable wealth, or not middle class. - Joe (representative for the middle class) watches as his life begins to fall apart after losing his job at the plant: - He has to take a job as a custodian making less than half of his previous salary. - His wife dies because her cancer was discovered too late. - It was discovered late because they couldn’t afford health insurance. Their conclusion is that the death of Joe’s wife is a direct result of the plant closing. And that Romney isn’t concerned about middle class problems, since they don’t affect him personally. ==Additional Resources== 3 articles, websites, people go to for more information ==References== <references/> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nj70XqOxptU bibliography

Return to Rhetorical appeals.