Rhetorical Velocity

From DigitalRhetoricCollaborative

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(added a section on analyzing rhetorical velocity)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
 
==Defining "Rhetorical Velocity"==
==Defining "Rhetorical Velocity"==
Line 11: Line 10:
Conceptual knowledge of rhetorical velocity helps writers deal with new issues of rapid delivery brought about by advances in communication technologies and the expanded frequency of recomposition practices. When we release a composition (be it text, video, image or some combination thereof) into a digital venue, what will happen to it as it is remixed and delivered among different discourses, venues and audiences? By considering rhetorical velocity beforehand, writers anticipate the ways in which their texts will be reconfigured, and re-used in both digital and physical spaces. By anticipating how a text will evolve, the writer can also attempt to control their intended delivery and outcomes to accomplish a text's rhetorical goal's
Conceptual knowledge of rhetorical velocity helps writers deal with new issues of rapid delivery brought about by advances in communication technologies and the expanded frequency of recomposition practices. When we release a composition (be it text, video, image or some combination thereof) into a digital venue, what will happen to it as it is remixed and delivered among different discourses, venues and audiences? By considering rhetorical velocity beforehand, writers anticipate the ways in which their texts will be reconfigured, and re-used in both digital and physical spaces. By anticipating how a text will evolve, the writer can also attempt to control their intended delivery and outcomes to accomplish a text's rhetorical goal's
-
====Analyzing Rhetorical Velocity====
+
==Analyzing Rhetorical Velocity==
Jim Ridolfo and Danielle Nicole DeVoss provide a useful heuristic for analyzing rhetorical velocity as a concern of invention. A text's velocity can be anticipated by considering the following heuristics:  
Jim Ridolfo and Danielle Nicole DeVoss provide a useful heuristic for analyzing rhetorical velocity as a concern of invention. A text's velocity can be anticipated by considering the following heuristics:  
Line 27: Line 26:
Furthermore, they categorize possible outcomes of a text's velocity by theorizing three "future possibilities" of appropriation: "positive appropriation" in which the text's velocity and recomposition works towards its original rhetorical goals; "neutral appropriation," in which the text's velocity is "neither seen as directly harmful or beneficial" to the text's rhetorical goals; and "negative appropriation," in which the text's appropriation by a third party is harmful to the original goals. <ref>"Velocity." Ridolfo, Jim and Dànielle Nicole DeVoss. "Composing for Recomposition: Rhetorical Velocity and Delivery." ''Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy'' 13.2 (2009). http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/13.2/topoi/ridolfo_devoss/velocity.html</ref>
Furthermore, they categorize possible outcomes of a text's velocity by theorizing three "future possibilities" of appropriation: "positive appropriation" in which the text's velocity and recomposition works towards its original rhetorical goals; "neutral appropriation," in which the text's velocity is "neither seen as directly harmful or beneficial" to the text's rhetorical goals; and "negative appropriation," in which the text's appropriation by a third party is harmful to the original goals. <ref>"Velocity." Ridolfo, Jim and Dànielle Nicole DeVoss. "Composing for Recomposition: Rhetorical Velocity and Delivery." ''Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy'' 13.2 (2009). http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/13.2/topoi/ridolfo_devoss/velocity.html</ref>
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
Writers in a digital age need to consider not just who will read their work, and how, but also “how might the text be rewritten?” and “why, where, and for whom might this text be rewritten?” Third parties, because of the ease of Web searching, the availability of so much information, and the ubiquity of copy-and-paste, might “plagiarize” texts. But writers can strategically produce texts for which this “plagiarism” is actually the desired end. “Rhetorical velocity” is the term used to measure or describe the speedy dissemination and broad travel of texts, leading to multiple possible recompositions or remixes. In the remix and redelivery of texts, certain elements may be amplified while others are discarded, and writers need to be aware of how their chosen medium and genre delimits or enables reuse. In the sphere of recomposition, then, delivery takes on increased importance as we write for others to reuse. - See more at: http://bb.bedfordstmartins.com/content/composing-recomposition-rhetorical-velocity-and-delivery#sthash.3kwosXVe.dpuf
 
==Teaching Resources==
==Teaching Resources==

Revision as of 18:48, 28 January 2015

Contents

Defining "Rhetorical Velocity"

Rhetorical Velocity is a term coined by Jim Ridolfo and conceptualized by Ridolfo and Dànielle Nicole DeVoss as "a strategic approach to composing for rhetorical delivery.... both [as] a way of considering delivery as a rhetorical mode, aligned with an understanding of howtexts work as a component of a strategy." [1] The concept describes a strategy in which rhetors compose a text in consideration of how it might be recomposed. The notion of velocity emphasizes what Ridolfo and DeVoss describe as "a conscious rhetorical concern for distance, travel, speed, and time, pertaining specifically to theorizing instances of strategic appropriation by a third party." As such, the concept relates to both the process of invention and indicates the way in which delivery has changed from how it has been historically situated.[2]

Ridolfo and DeVoss demonstrate that this concept of rhetorical velocity has considerations for traditional texts, such as press releases, as well as for digital media. Rhetorical velocity also has impacts concerning copyright[3] and Creative Commons.[4]

Understanding Rhetorical Velocity

Conceptual knowledge of rhetorical velocity helps writers deal with new issues of rapid delivery brought about by advances in communication technologies and the expanded frequency of recomposition practices. When we release a composition (be it text, video, image or some combination thereof) into a digital venue, what will happen to it as it is remixed and delivered among different discourses, venues and audiences? By considering rhetorical velocity beforehand, writers anticipate the ways in which their texts will be reconfigured, and re-used in both digital and physical spaces. By anticipating how a text will evolve, the writer can also attempt to control their intended delivery and outcomes to accomplish a text's rhetorical goal's

Analyzing Rhetorical Velocity

Jim Ridolfo and Danielle Nicole DeVoss provide a useful heuristic for analyzing rhetorical velocity as a concern of invention. A text's velocity can be anticipated by considering the following heuristics:

"1. Who is interested? 2. Why do they want to recompose my work? 3. What will they produce? 4. How might it be delivered? 5. How might I work to facilitate this? 6. What genres and mediums will the works potentially transcend (ex: from press advisory to broadcast news, web text, and analog newspaper)? 7. And what will the temporal lifespan be? (ex: how long will the newspaper be in circulation?)"

("Rhetorical Velocity as a Concern of Invention")

Furthermore, they categorize possible outcomes of a text's velocity by theorizing three "future possibilities" of appropriation: "positive appropriation" in which the text's velocity and recomposition works towards its original rhetorical goals; "neutral appropriation," in which the text's velocity is "neither seen as directly harmful or beneficial" to the text's rhetorical goals; and "negative appropriation," in which the text's appropriation by a third party is harmful to the original goals. [5]


Teaching Resources

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-u095F6UQzo


References

  1. Ridolfo, Jim and Dànielle Nicole DeVoss. "Composing for Recomposition: Rhetorical Velocity and Delivery." Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy 13.2 (2009). http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/13.2/topoi/ridolfo_devoss/intro.html
  2. Ridolfo, Jim and Dànielle Nicole DeVoss. "Composing for Recomposition: Rhetorical Velocity and Delivery." Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy 13.2 (2009). http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/13.2/topoi/ridolfo_devoss/history.html
  3. Ridolfo, Jim and Martine Courant Rife. "Rhetorical Velocity and Copyright: A Case Study on Strategies of Rhetorical Delivery." Copy(write): Intellectual Property in the Writing Classroom. Eds. Martine Courant Rife, Shaunt Slattery, and Dànielle Nicole DeVoss. Fort Collins, Colorado: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press. 2011. http://http://wac.colostate.edu/books/copywrite/chapter12.pdf
  4. Charles Lowe. "Considerations for Creative Commons Licensing of Open Educational Resources: The Value of Copyleft." Computers and Composition Online September 2010. http://www2.bgsu.edu/departments/english/cconline/open/applying-rhetorical-velocity.html
  5. "Velocity." Ridolfo, Jim and Dànielle Nicole DeVoss. "Composing for Recomposition: Rhetorical Velocity and Delivery." Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy 13.2 (2009). http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/13.2/topoi/ridolfo_devoss/velocity.html
Personal tools